Mimikry, aposematismus a příbuzné jevy - citace a reference

Mimicry and Aposematism - dvě knihy Stanislava Komárka volně ke stažení

Tato kniha, nebo jiné autorovy publikace na téma mimikry, aposematismus a příbuzné jevy, jsou citovány v následujících pracech:

  • Ant minicry. Wikipedia. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant_mimicry

  • Aposematism. Wikipedia. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism

  • Allison J.D., Borden J.H., Seybold S.J.: A review of the chemical ecology of Cerambycidae.
    Chemoecology 14(3-4): 123-150, 2004.

  • Cordero C.: A different look at the false head of butterflies.
    Ecol.Entomol.26(1): 106-108, 2002.

  • Exnerová A., Svádová K., Štys P.,Barcalová S., Landová E., Prokopová M.,Fuchs R.,Socha R.: Importance of colour in the reaction of passerine predators to aposematic prey: experiments with mutants of Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera).
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 88(1): 143-153, 2009.

  • Exnerová A., Landová E., Štys P., Fuchs R., Prokopová M., Tehláriková P.: Reactions of passerine birds to aposematic and non-aposematic firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus, Heteroptera).
    Biol.Journ.Linn.Soc. 78(4): 517-525, 2003.

  • Gilbert F.: The evolution of imperfect mimicry in hoverflies
    pp 231-288 in MDE Fellowes, GJ, Holloway & J Rolff (eds.) Insect Evolutionary Ecology. CABI, Wallingford, UK, 2005.

  • Grim T.: Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblences between brood parasites and theit hosts are mimetic and which are not?
    Biol.Journ.Linn.Soc. 84: 69-78, 2005.

  • Hill R.I., Vaca J.F.: Differential wing strength in Pierella butterflies (Nymphalidae, Satyridae) supports the deflection hypothesis.
    Biotropica 26 (3): 362-370, 2004.

  • Inbar M., Lav-Yadun S.: Conspicuous and aposematic spines in the animal kingdom.
    Naturwissenschaften 92: 170-172, 2005.

  • Jiun Nan-Huang : Taxonomic study of Myrmarachne (Araneae: Salticidae) from Taiwan.
    National Sun Yat-sen University, Taipei (Master Thesis), 2004.

  • Kleisner K.: The semantic morphology of Adolf Portmann: A starting point for the biosemiotics of organic form?
    Biosemiotics (2008) 1: 207-219, 2008.

  • Kleisner K., Markoš A.: The semetic rings: towards a new concept of mimetic resemblance.
    Theor.in Biosci.123: 209-222, 2005.

  • Kull. K.: An introduction to phytosemiotics: Semiotic botany and vegetative sign systems.
    Sign Systems Studies 28: 326-350, 2000.

  • Langerhans R.B.: Evolutionary consequences of predation: avoidance, escape, reproduction, and diversification.
    Pp.177-220. in: A.M.T. Elewa, ed.): Predation in organisms: a distinct phenomenon. Springer, Heidelberg, 2006.

  • Lev-Yadun S.: Aposematic (warning) coloration in plants. Pp. in: Plant-environment interactions. Signaling and communication in plants (Baluška F.ed.).
    Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009.

  • Lyytinen A., Brakefield P.M., Mappes J.: Significance of butterfly eyespots as an anti-predator device in ground-based and aerial attacks.
    Oikos 100(2): 373-379, 2003.

  • Maran T.: Mimicry as a communication semiotic phenomenon (Mimikri kui kommunikatsiooni-semiootiline fenomen).
    216 Pp. Dissertationes semioticae Universitatis Tartuensis 7, Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 2005.

  • Maran T.: Mimikri ja petturi aktiivsus. Vale Teooria.
    Schola Biotheoretica 31: 99-106. Tartu: Eesti Looduseuurijate Selts, 2005.

  • Maran T.: Mimicry.
    Semiotics Encyclopedia Online. (Boussiac P., Lewis A. eds.) E.J.Pratt Library, Victoria University, 2007.

  • Markoš A., Grygar F., Kleisner K., Neubauer Z.: Towards a Darwinian biosemiotics. Life as mutual understanding.
    in : Barbieri M.(ed.):Introduction to biosemiotics, Pp.235-255. Springer, Dordrecht, 2007.

  • Pekár S., Král J.: Mimicry complex in two central European zodariid spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae): how Zodarion deceives ants.
    Biol. Journ. Linn. Soc. 75: 517–532, 2002.

  • Roberts D.: František Skála's “Feeling for Nature“.
    Umění/Art 55 (6/2007): 481-497, 2007.

  • Ruxton G.D., Sherat T.N., Speed M.P.: Avoiding attack: the evolotionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry.
    Oxford Univ.Press, 2004.

  • Santos J.C., Coloma L.A., Canatella D.C.: Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs.
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100(22): 12792–12797, 2003.

  • Schappertl P.J., Shore J.S.: Ecology, population biology and mortality of Euptoieta hegesia Cramer (Nymphalidae).
    Journ.Lepidopterologists´Soc. 52(1): 9-39, 1998.

  • Stevens M.: The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principially demonstrated in the Lepidoptera.
    Biol.Reviews 80(4): 573-588, 2005.

  • Šklíba J., Šumbera R., Chitaukali W.N.: Reactions to disturbances in the context of antipredatory behaviour in a solitary subterranean rodent.
    Journ.Ethol.26 (2): 249-254, 2008.

  • Veselý P., Fuchs R.: Newly emerged Batesian mimicry protects only unfamiliar prey.
    Evolutionary Ecology 23:, 2009

  • Veselý P., Veselá S., Fuchs R., Zrzavý J.: Are gregarious red-black shieldbucks Graphosoma lineatum (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) realy aposematic? An experimental approach.
    Evol.Ecol.Res. 8: 881-890, 2006.

  • Vlieger L., Brakefield P.M.: ): The deflection hypothesis: eyespots on the margins of butterfly wings do not influence predation by lizards.
    Biol.Journ.Linn.Soc. 92(4): 661-667, 2007.

  • Williams E.H., jr.: The nature handbook (Chap.4, Color and Pattern).
    Oxford Univ.Press, 2005.

Zpátky na hlavní stránku